Archive for the ‘automation’ Category

Anti-tie Down Logic

Friday, September 18th, 2009
 Anti-tie down logic is normally a good design practice to include in your PLC logic when you have an operator standing in front of a semi-automatic machine. Operators have a lot of things on their minds when they are working on your machine. Using anti-tie down insures safety by making sure the operator’s hands are in a safe position during a potentially hazardous motion.

You should always evaluate your machine safety requirements and make sure you are allowed to use two-handed inputs directly before implementing PLC logic for two-hand controls. If your machine safety evaluation finds that you are not allowed or your conditions are too hazardous, you should always use a safety rated two-hand control module instead of PLC logic or use two-hand control PLC logic in conjunction with a light curtain to protect the front of the machine.

 

The idea behind anti-tie down is to make sure the operator places both hands on a set of input feedback such as a set of Opto Touch buttons. If your application will not allow for PLC logic as the anti-tie down method, then there are safety modules available such as a DUO-TOUCH module that will accomplish the same things as this PLC logic.

Anti-tie down logic requires the operator to place their hands on the input device at the same time and not release until the condition is safe to remove the hands. In the case of a rotary index table, the operator hands must remain on the Opto Touch buttons until the index table has cycled one complete index and stopped motion. If this operator releases their hands before the motion is complete, the index table should stop.

 

Operators’ placing their hands on the Opto Touch buttons at the same time is a safety issue. If a false input on one of the buttons were sensed, then it would only take the other input to start the machine cycle. Some past causes of a false input conditions could be a person laying a rag on top of one of the opto buttons. Granted, opto technology has become far more advanced and this situation is not likely. However these types of false input considerations must be taking into account so your logic can be written to prevent false cycle starts and possibility prevent bodily harm.

If you are in doubt about your machine’s safety requirements, chances are best if you choose to install a safety module instead of PLC logic or use a light curtain with your Opto Touch buttons.

Download the Anti-Tie Down RS LOGIX example, PDF included. Winzip Required.

 

 

 

Courtesy mrplc.com

 

 

 

 

 

Allen Bradley Allen Bradley Allen Bradley

Friday, May 22nd, 2009

That seems to be the name name in PLCs in the USA. Allen Bradley Allen Bradley Allen Bradley is all we hear now. Does anyone still use Modicon or Siemens PLCs? How about Square D or Omron or Mitsubishi? Any old TI users still out there? I would like to hear from you. Allen Bradley does make some very high quality plcs and controls. They have about 60% of the US market for plcs I believe.

Bill

www.tek-supply.com

Allen Bradley SLC 500 Sale.

Friday, May 22nd, 2009

Just wanted to let everyone know that the PLC Superstore is having a Spring Allen Bradley sale. Thru the end of June we are offering a 10% discount from our already low prices on reconditioned Allen Bradley PLCs.

Visit our web site at: www.tek-supply.com for great deals on Allen Bradley automation products.

Also visit www.plcsuperstore.com and www.allenbradleyplc.net for more savings on Allen Bradley controls and plcs.

Factory automation safety networks are emerging as the next competitive battleground in the automation

Thursday, February 26th, 2009

Factory automation safety networks are emerging as the next competitive battleground in the automation network wars. Drawing on legacy battles in areas such as serial-based device networks, process fieldbuses, and Ethernet-based automation networks, suppliers and network trade associations alike are ramping up their arsenals for competition in this increasingly important arena. This race will fuel growth in the worldwide market for factory automation safety networks at a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 39.3% over the next five years. The market totaled less than 700 thousand nodes in 2008, a figure that is forecast to grow to over 3.6 million in 2013, according to a new ARC Advisory Group study.

Factory“The safety network market will benefit from the same quantifiable cost savings in areas such as wiring and installation that fueled adoption of standard device networks over hard wiring, plus they can deliver concrete business benefits in areas such as regulatory compliance and reduced shutdowns. The timing and impact of safety regulations remains a wild card in many parts of the world, but both existing suppliers and new entrants are lining up their safety network strategies as the technology increasingly emerges as a key differentiator,” according to Vice President Chantal Polsonetti, the principal author of ARC’s “Factory Automation Safety Networks Worldwide Outlook”.

Cost Savings versus Hard Wiring
Growth in the safety network market will parallel that of serial-based device networks from the perspective of the wiring savings a bus-based network can deliver relative to hard wiring of safety components. These savings are realized in areas such as reduced cable costs, smaller panels and cable trays, fewer components required, reduced cost of wire installation, and greater flexibility in reconfiguring the network as operations dictate. Increasing availability of light curtains, safety switches, and other safe components with a network interface will only further the potential cost savings in this area. Growth in interest in wireless safety devices will further fuel cabling and installation savings.

Reduced Downtime through Isolated or Controlled Shutdowns
Limiting the operational impact of a safety event is another business benefit derived from use of safety networks. Ability to implement controlled or isolated shutdowns by decelerating motors or isolating emergency stops to specific zones has significant benefits relative to tripped E-stops or light curtains initiating complete system shutdowns and often time-consuming restarts. Servo drive manufacturers have already recognized this trend and are moving toward integrated safety network components for their drive systems that allow controlled or limited shutdowns.

Safe Motion Fuels Growth in Motion Control
Integration of safety functionality into servo drives and other motion control equipment is one of the most intriguing drivers in the factory automation safety marketplace. Embedding a safety controller and safe I/O right into a servo drive with a soft starter eliminates the need for a separate safety controller and I/O. Safety functions are integrated directly into the drive, eliminating the need for external power contactors and speed monitoring equipment and enabling local control.

New Wireless Parking Lot and Area Lighting Control System

Saturday, February 21st, 2009


New Wireless Parking Lot and Area Lighting Control System

Sunrise Technologies/FPOLC announces the Wi-OLC, a ZigBee-compliant, self healing, multi-hopping wireless system for control of parking lot and area lighting. Outdoor lighting, often overlooked in green initiatives, consumes considerable amounts of fossil fuels that contribute to global warming. The Wi-OLC system provides the ultimate flexibility in turning outdoor lights off when not needed. A base station controlled by a PC communicates user-programmed radio signals to override dusk-to-dawn operation by twistlock Lighting Control Communications Modules (LCCM) or contactors. LCCMs are installed like regular twistlock controls. The system configures itself automatically at installation. www.fpolc.com

Recession hampers wireless in automotive

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

Long known for being at the forefront of adopting new technologies, the automotive industry has also taken the lead for wireless adoption among the discrete industries. But the impact of global recession on the industry is likely to restrain the extent of wireless investments in the short-term future.

Right now, the European automotive industry contributes close to 42% of the wireless market in discrete industries, according to a report from industry research firm, Frost & Sullivan. There are various factors that drive wireless adoption across the automotive industry such as the need for real time data, work-force mobility, and substantial saving in cabling costs, but the industry is in a compelling situation to have a strict control over its budgets.

The automotive industry needs real-time data. Real-time information from wireless devices assures quality and consistency at the end of every process. As vehicles undergo multiple processes simultaneously, wireless devices ensure assembly lines work in tandem with each other with the help of the real-time data. This data also helps in verifying if maintenance activity is in phase with the production and the process flow. An example for such an application is the usage of wireless sensors in material replacement process where it transmits signals to inventory area to re-stock the required components. This process optimizes the entire production flow, prevents break-down of the process, and also saves considerable time and manual effort. Few automobile plants have the Real Time Location System that helps in identifying any item located in the plant environment.

Wireless devices greatly assure work force mobility and flexibility in an automotive plant. Wireless sensors are in the robotics applications for the line testing process. Information goes to the robot through wireless sensors, which prepare the vehicle for wind, water, and other tests in the process of line testing. This operation significantly reduces the manual labor and provides flexibility and convenience in the manufacturing process. Ease of installation and commissioning, another major driver for wireless adoption, has enabled wireless devices to be a “plug and play” device. The flexibility that the device provides during the initial installation and the rearrangement of the machinery layout enables quicker process with lower cost attached.

There could be numerous product variances from one car to another in a car plant as customer choices increase. Routing wires and managing inventory for every product added on in every single process is time consuming and also lots of human effort is required. Wireless provides a perfect alternative for this process: It simplifies the task by accessing the information even from inaccessible and remote parts. Reduction in the cabling cost is another major driver for wireless adoption; almost 30% to 50 % of the cabling cost can reduce by implementing wireless connectivity. The usage of automated guided vehicle AGV, a wireless application that helps in transmitting the vehicle to the next logical point, is providing significant cost reduction in cabling.

As most manufacturing plants shift focus toward just-in-time and build-to-order marketing philosophies with an aim for cost reduction at every stage of production, the automotive industry should have an assertive approach toward the wireless adoption. This industry with a huge potential for wireless deployment will have a slower adoption over the next two years. However, considering the obvious benefits that wireless offers, the adoption could get higher as the industry witnesses stronger growth over the medium and long-term future.

—Khadambari Shanbagaraman is a research analyst for Frost & Sullivan Industrial Automation & Process Control Group.

Perspectives on global automation

Thursday, February 5th, 2009

By Jim Pinto

I’ve been traveling for the past few months. I spent some time in Australia in September 2008, and then a couple of weeks in Europe, then South Africa, and finally India; I returned in January. I’d like to share some of my global perspectives on the automation business.

Globalization is generating a revolution in the rules of business, which will cause old dinosaurs to whiter away as new leaders emerge. Leadership traditionally came from the advanced, developed countries. There’s nothing “traditional” any more.

For several decades now, the assumption has been that the U.S. and other industrialized nations (Europe and Japan) would keep leading in knowledge intensive industries, while the “underdeveloped” countries provided unskilled labor. That has changed.

Remember how Japan changed the rules after WWII, to claim leadership in many technology arenas? In the same way, many countries around the world now compete. Competition is spreading. Through inexpensive, universal communications technology, knowledge-based work is migrating worldwide to the highest-quality, lowest-cost providers.

The next major changes will come not from incremental improvements, but new “inflection points” generated by innovation. And innovation may come from virtually anywhere, not just the advanced first-world countries. What makes you think America or Europe or Japan has the intrinsic innovation advantage?

The human factor, “asymmetric motivation,” is forcing change. In advanced regions such as North America and Europe, salaries are high and the motivation to work long hours is limited to those few who have natural drive. By contrast, in developing countries, the push for upward mobility is intense, which results in huge productivity differences.

Remember, wherever factories are built, automation equipment and services will be bought and sold. North America and Europe are stagnating simply because few new process plants and factories are being built in these regions these days. In spite of the current worldwide recession, foreign automation markets will continue to expand because that is where investments are being made. To succeed, Americans must go to where the business is. And we must have innovative and cost-competitive products that perform well against global competitors. Otherwise, we’re “toast.”

Within the next two decades, India will overtake China to become the world’s most populous country. Both countries’ middle-class populations are advancing quickly to produce and consume a vast amount of products, services, and energy. For any organization, growth plans must take into account the markets in these and other major, advancing countries.

Related links:

Behind the byline

Jim Pinto is an industry analyst and founder of Action Instruments. You can e-mail him at jim@jimpinto.com or view his writings at www.JimPinto.com. Read the Table of Contents of his book, Pinto’s Points, at www.jimpinto.com/writings/points.html.

Think ahead: Build a system on security

Sunday, January 25th, 2009

Manufacturing is always looking to squeeze as much out of the process as possible. Increased productivity and lower productions costs means a hike in profitability, which is what it is all about.
But if someone can hack into your system, just how much profit do you think you will make? The answer to that question is simple. None. Manufacturers have systems and then they think about adding in some security.
That is where manufacturers have to start thinking a bit differently. The foundation for their systems has to be secure. Security can not be an after thought; in these cyber-focused days, it needs to be the first thing a manufacturer has to think about before putting together their systems.
“It is amazing how fragile we are underneath,” Green Hills Software Director of Networking Solutions Sue Hares said today at the Green Hills Software Technology Summit 2008 in Santa Barbara, Calif. “We have to include security from the ground up. Operating systems are vulnerable and firewalls do not solve the problem. You need to change the paradigm.”
How hostile is the world today? She asked. Over 150 million records were breached over the past three years, she said. “Cyber crime is becoming a for hire business that is as easy as point, click and hack.”
Sometimes to ensure a different outcome true leaders have to look outside their cozy safe comfort zone.
“Change will not come from within the industry,” said Dan Perrier, president of Automated Control systems Inc., a Vancouver, Wash.-based system integrator that focuses on the power industry. “Sometimes we have to model other industries. To force change in your industry, sometimes you have to look outside your industry.”
Rest assured though, change has to occur.
“Everything we have is based on computer systems and basically they are not secure,” said Dan O’Dowd, founder and chief executive at Green Hills Software. “They are in charge of everything in our lives and they are not secure. They are in charge of our money, our privacy, our democracy and our lives.”
Instead of building a system and then checking it for security, they should start with security then build the system, said Jimmy Sorrells, vice president of enterprise products at Integrity Global Security a subsidiary of Green Hills Software. Instead of building a system focused on functionality, performance and then adding in security, Sorrells said security first. A system should start with security then add in functionality and then performance. This way you have a solid base to add a secure future.
“Security is backwards; it is broken,” Sorrells said. “Security is the first thing you should do. You get security by building security.”
While it is easy to feel everyone is out to get you and you should fear everything, but it is not all doom and gloom for O’Dowd. “In 10 years we can have a safe infrastructure that we can bet our lives on everyday.”

Emerson deals for Calif. integrator

Sunday, January 25th, 2009

As integration becomes more of a key element throughout the industry, Emerson today acquired Napa, Calif.-based Bay-Tec Engineering.
Bay-Tec Engineering is a process control system engineering and industrial technical services company focused on project management, engineering and design (including cGMP processes), system integration, panel fabrication, installation and commissioning, calibration, and system validation. Terms of the deal were not immediately available.
“The acquisition expands our ability to address industry needs for automation engineering and project management solutions, particularly on the U.S. West Coast,” said Steve Sonnenberg, president, Emerson Process Management.
“Emerson’s global reach and technological leadership will help us to better serve our valued existing clients, as well as new ones,” said John Justus, president of Bay-Tec. “Our organizations are well aligned in terms of our strong focus on meeting client automation needs.”

GETTING INTO PRODUCTION

Friday, January 23rd, 2009

This is an excerpt from Henry Ford’s Autobiography called “My Life & Work”. It is very relevant to modern manufacturing methods and automation.

CHAPTER V: GETTING INTO PRODUCTION

A Ford car contains about five thousand parts–that is counting screws, nuts, and all. Some of the parts are fairly bulky and others are almost the size of watch parts. In our first assembling we simply started to put a car together at a spot on the floor and workmen brought to it the parts as they were needed in exactly the same way that one builds a house. When we started to make parts it was natural to create a single department of the factory to make that part, but usually one workman performed all of the operations necessary on a small part. The rapid press of production made it necessary to devise plans of production that would avoid having the workers falling over one another. The undirected worker spends more of his time walking about for materials and tools than he does in working; he gets small pay because pedestrianism is not a highly paid line.

The first step forward in assembly came when we began taking the work to the men instead of the men to the work. We now have two general principles in all operations–that a man shall never have to take more than one step, if possibly it can be avoided, and that no man need ever stoop over.

The principles of assembly are these:

(1) Place the tools and the men in the sequence of the operation so that each component part shall travel the least possible distance while in the process of finishing.

(2) Use work slides or some other form of carrier so that when a workman completes his operation, he drops the part always in the same place–which place must always be the most convenient place to his hand–and if possible have gravity carry the part to the next workman for his operation.

(3) Use sliding assembling lines by which the parts to be assembled are delivered at convenient distances.

The net result of the application of these principles is the reduction of the necessity for thought on the part of the worker and the reduction of his movements to a minimum. He does as nearly as possible only one thing with only one movement. The assembling of the chassis is, from the point of view of the non-mechanical mind, our most interesting and perhaps best known operation, and at one time it was an exceedingly important operation. We now ship out the parts for assembly at the point of distribution.

Along about April 1, 1913, we first tried the experiment of an assembly line. We tried it on assembling the flywheel magneto. We try everything in a little way first–we will rip out anything once we discover a better way, but we have to know absolutely that the new way is going to be better than the old before we do anything drastic.

I believe that this was the first moving line ever installed. The idea came in a general way from the overhead trolley that the Chicago packers use in dressing beef. We had previously assembled the fly-wheel magneto in the usual method. With one workman doing a complete job he could turn out from thirty-five to forty pieces in a nine-hour day, or about twenty minutes to an assembly. What he did alone was then spread into twenty-nine operations; that cut down the assembly time to thirteen minutes, ten seconds. Then we raised the height of the line eight inches–this was in 1914–and cut the time to seven minutes. Further experimenting with the speed that the work should move at cut the time down to five minutes. In short, the result is this: by the aid of scientific study one man is now able to do somewhat more than four did only a comparatively few years ago. That line established the efficiency of the method and we now use it everywhere.
The assembling of the motor, formerly done by one man, is now divided into eighty-four operations–those men do the work that three times their number formerly did. In a short time we tried out the plan on the chassis.

About the best we had done in stationary chassis assembling was an average of twelve hours and twenty-eight minutes per chassis. We tried the experiment of drawing the chassis with a rope and windlass down a line two hundred fifty feet long. Six assemblers traveled with the chassis and picked up the parts from piles placed along the line. This rough experiment reduced the time to five hours fifty minutes per chassis. In the early part of 1914 we elevated the assembly line. We had adopted the policy of “man-high” work; we had one line twenty-six and three quarter inches and another twenty-four and one half inches from the floor–to suit squads of different heights. The waist-high arrangement and a further subdivision of work so that each man had fewer movements cut down the labour time per chassis to one hour thirty-three minutes. Only the chassis was then assembled in the line. The body was placed on in “John R.
Street”–the famous street that runs through our Highland Park factories. Now the line assembles the whole car.

It must not be imagined, however, that all this worked out as quickly as it sounds. The speed of the moving work had to be carefully tried out; in the fly-wheel magneto we first had a speed of sixty inches per minute. That was too fast. Then we tried eighteen inches per minute. That was too slow. Finally we settled on forty-four inches per minute. The idea is that a man must not be hurried in his work–he must have every second necessary but not a single unnecessary second. We have worked out speeds for each assembly, for the success of the chassis assembly caused us gradually to overhaul our entire method of manufacturing and to put all assembling in mechanically driven lines. The chassis assembling line, for instance, goes at a pace of six feet per minute; the front axle assembly line goes at one hundred eighty-nine inches per minute. In the chassis assembling are forty-five separate operations or stations.
The first men fasten four mud-guard brackets to the chassis frame; the motor arrives on the tenth operation and so on in detail. Some men do only one or two small operations, others do more. The man who places a part does not fasten it–the part may not be fully in place until after several operations later. The man who puts in a bolt does not put on the nut; the man who puts on the nut does not tighten it. On operation number thirty-four the budding motor gets its gasoline; it has previously received lubrication; on operation number forty-four the radiator is filled with water, and on operation number forty-five the car drives out onto John R. Street.