Archive for the ‘Home Automation’ Category

European Smart-Home Initiatives Get a Boost from Nokia

Wednesday, February 4th, 2009

Ten years ago, the “smart home” was all the rage. Almost every company in our market had a concept center or display house that showed the functionality of the digital home.

I remember a visit to GTE’s (prior to them becoming Verizon) offices in the Dallas area, where they had a multiroom digital home display that showed a variety of advanced communications, entertainment, and home management features. It appeared that the world was quickly heading to a time in which consumers could expect much more out of their homes.

These mock-ups and broad strategies fell out of favor after the dot-com crash early in the 00s, as companies tended to focus more on tactical solutions – concepts aimed at one or two main applications around communications and entertainment – and much less on the other smart-home applications around home control or home management.

There are exceptions, of course, but these have typically not been driven by the service providers. Microsoft has had a digital home in the parking lot of the Las Vegas Convention Center for the past few years. HP has had a mock-up in the parking lot of its Cupertino campus for some time. However, most companies have tended to focus more on one or a select group of connected products (DLNA type of connectivity) instead of the holistic smart home type of concept.

As service providers withdrew from the smart-home space, the promise of an integrated smart home (providing consumers with flexible and convenient ways to manage their home’s security, lighting, and energy management) has languished. So, while we see high penetration of data networks in Europe (thanks in large part to the active participation of broadband service providers deploying residential gateways), the penetration of systems such as home security has remained relatively low.

The next two charts indicate the disparity that exists in European households between the penetration of home networks and the penetration of certain home systems, in this case monitored home security. With broadband service providers providing home networking solutions in the form of advanced residential gateways, home network penetration in Europe will more than double between 2008 and 2012, surpassing 80 million households. Residential gateways will constitute an ever-growing presence among these households, accounting for more than 40% of home networks.

To bring greater lifestyle enhancements to consumers – better management of lighting, security, energy, and health – service providers will have to become much more involved in deploying nodes and accompanying services. This list of players will include not only the broadband and television providers who are active today but also energy utilities, security companies, and healthcare providers. The good news is that the European market in particular appears to be experiencing a renaissance in service-provider activity in the digital home/smart home.

European service providers again target the Smart Home

The European market for home systems and the smart-home concept in particular appears to be gaining traction because of current efforts by service providers, technology vendors, and consumer electronics companies. Mobile giant Nokia is the latest service provider-oriented company to announce plans to engage in this space by focusing on how the mobile phone can help consumers better manage their home systems, including lighting, security, and HVAC. On November 27, 2008, the company announced that it is developing a smart home platform, the Nokia Home Control Center. The platform will be the “basis for next-generation security, smart home solutions, and household energy management systems.”

The Control Center will focus on electricity usage control, device control, and monitoring for temperature, cameras, and motion. Nokia envisions whole-home systems – such as security and HVAC – being integrated with the Control Center in the future. Users can then control all devices and systems with smartphones and PCs.

Nokia has started working with a number of companies to define and create a solid basis for building the next generation of products that will introduce a new kind of mobile access to intelligent systems at the home. These collaboration partners include Danfoss, Delta Dore, Ensto, Meishar Immediate Community (MIC), and Zensys. The Z-Wave Alliance (which supports the marketing efforts for the communications protocol developed by Zensys) is an active participant in the European market and has received support from the Energy & Climate Ministry in Denmark and Modstroem, a Danish utility company.

Nokia and the mobile phone industry are not alone in pushing smart home developments. It is encouraging to see companies such as Echelon actively working with energy utilities on a pan-European basis to deploy its Networked Energy Services (NES) Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) system. The company has announced smart-metering projects in Denmark, France, Russia, and Sweden, among many countries.

ZigBee is another core communications technology that is helping a growing number of vendors and service providers deploy energy management solutions in the European market. In addition to announcing support for Z-Wave in its Control Center application, Nokia is also supporting ZigBee, meaning that we’ll see this communications protocol in the mobile-led efforts in Europe as well. There is one announced deployment of a European “smart grid” solution in Gothenberg, Sweden, and the ZigBee Alliance notes that there are trials in several other European locations.

Additional European energy utilities are active with smart-meter deployments that could pave the way for additional smart-home applications. Landis+Gyr, for example, works with energy utilities in the Czech Republic, Finland, Italy, Moldova, Spain, and Sweden to deploy automated meter systems.

The smart-home concept isn’t limited to energy service providers, however. U.K.-based Intamac works with both broadband service providers and home security monitoring companies to deploy enhanced home security solutions that include features for remote monitoring.

EnOcean reports more than 500,000 of its self-powered wireless control systems are in use worldwide. Its recent partnership with LonMark International will help sustain momentum in residential markets. WeberHaus, a German home builder, installs EnOcean’s wireless sensors in its line of sustainable homes. Clients build single-room or whole-home control packages from a range of lighting, heating, window shade, security, and central monitoring control devices.

Xanboo is another company targeting more integrated home monitoring and home controls solutions, and it is also targeting relationships with broadband and communications service providers. Notably, the company has distribution relationships with Elisa in Finland and security product companies in Italy and the U.K.

Are consumers ready for the Smart Home?

As consumers grow accustomed to the advanced communications infrastructure coming into their home and mobile devices and the features that can be enabled via device-to-device (and system-to-system) connectivity, smart-home applications will be a natural addition to data, communications, and entertainment nodes already found in homes around the world.

Consumers in North America and Europe already show an interest in more enhanced control of home systems for lighting, security, and energy management. It’s interesting to note that consumers in Italy and Spain express the highest interest in these functionalities. Both countries have service providers that have been active in smart-home technology deployments over the last decade. Echelon did early work with Italian energy utility Enel to deploy smart meters and accompanying smart-home nodes. Swedish utility Vattenfall AB has similarly deployed hundreds of thousands of Echelon-enabled smart meters. With the active involvement of these service providers, the consumer mindset about the smart home will be stronger in countries where people can be educated about the benefits of integrated and interactive home systems and smart-home features.

Interest in remote monitoring features is significantly higher among home network owners (and specifically those with wireless technologies) than consumers without these technologies. As Europe leads the way with advanced network deployments, the European service provider community in particular will provide a significant catalyst to the growth of additional home networking features, including more smart-home applications. Service providers have unique billing, marketing, and customer-support relationships with their customers, and they should leverage these to address the significant potential that advanced home networks and connectivity applications have to offer.

ABOUT PARKS ASSOCIATES

Parks Associates is an internationally recognized market research and consulting company specializing in emerging consumer technology products and services. Founded in 1986, Parks Associates creates research capital for companies ranging from Fortune 500 to small start-ups through market reports, primary studies, consumer research, custom research, workshops, executive conferences, and annual service subscriptions.

The company’s expertise includes new media, digital entertainment and gaming, home networks, Internet and television services, digital health, mobile applications and services, consumer electronics, and home control systems and security.

Each year, Parks Associates hosts executive thought leadership conferences CONNECTIONS™, with support from the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA®), and CONNECTIONS™ Europe. In addition, Parks Associates produces the online publication Industry Insights in conjunction with the CONNECTIONS™ Conference series.

Next Generation Remote Controls

Wednesday, February 4th, 2009

By Cees Links, CEO of GreenPeak

With a single, universal RF remote device, consumers will be able to control every aspect of their connected home. RF is engineered to control more than a TV and DVD, it can also control lighting, heating and air conditioning, blinds and shutters. Two-way communication can also be used to help you locate your lost remote control hidden in the couch pillows or under the table.

This new generation of RF communication is opening up a market for low cost, reliable high speed RF remote controls and is expected to have a huge impact on the user experience, as IEEE 802.15.4 remote controls will allow a completely new way to use a remote control. In short, the development of radio frequency remote controls will replace IR remote controls and deliver richer communications, increase reliability and improve flexibility

Media Center, Music Server, Video Server? What do I need?

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009

Author: Gregg Cannon – Cannon PC

What has been confusing as the convergence products emerge is the different terms used to describe them. We hear terms like Media Center, Video Server, Music Server, Home Theater PC, Media Server, whole house audio, video distribution as well as product names like ReQuest, Escient, Kaleidescape.

It leaves most consumers dazed and confused.

In this article I try to give you a brief description of the products and then break down the different products and highlight their features.

As an electronics consumer, you’ve been hearing for years how that someday the A/V industry and the computer industry will converge (or at best get along). That someday your whole rack of equipment can be reduced to a few small appliance type devices that give you all the capabilities of a room full of equipment. You’ll have the ability to control your lights, HVAC, audio, video, DVDs, and more from a single remote, touch screen devices strategically placed throughout the house or from your phone or office. Well … it’s here … but it is confusing.

Over the past few years I have seen vast improvements between these two industries and their technologies and how they are coming together. It has been painful to say the least but they are getting there. These two industries, which are separate and still battle over how music and video should be stored, organized, played, and streamed, are finally burying the hatchet and are working together to provide simple but powerful integrated solutions for customers.

Some of the reasons for this new “friendly” alliance have been the consumer. We, as consumers, are requesting less equipment, less complication and friendly interfaces. Since most of our media is digital, it makes sense for the A/V industry to work closely with the computer industry to make this happen. Especially since the computer industry has always been digital.

What has been confusing as the convergence products emerge is the different terms used to describe them. We hear terms like Media Center, Video Server, Music Server, Home Theater PC, Media Server, whole house audio, video distribution as well as product names like ReQuest, Escient, Kaleidescape.

It leaves most consumers dazed and confused.

Do I need a Media Center or Media Server? What is the difference?

In this article I try to give you a brief description of the products and then break down the different products and highlight their features.

Let’s start with general definitions.

Music Server – Most music servers are just what they say they are, Music Servers. They store and organize you digital music and allow you to play it locally or in multiple zones in a home (depending on the hardware and software you purchase with the system as an option)

Video Server – A video server, like a music server, is designed to serve up video content. In the case of ReQuest and Kaleidescape, they can control DVD jukes boxes to allow you to store your DVDs and play them through specialized controllers to other rooms in the house. There are some 3rd party applications that allow PCs (Media Centers) to copy DVDs to the hard drive and play them to other PCs or extenders in the home. Due to current DRM laws in the U.S., this method is in violation of the copyright and usage law of the DVD. So commercially this cannot be done. Privately this is a VERY common practice.

Media Center – A Media Center is usually referred Media Center PC, HTPC or Media PC. The term usually refers to a personal computer running Microsoft Vista Media Center. There are other variations like SageTV and Media Portal but all in all they are PC based systems that allow the storing and playback of music, photos, videos and TV.

The table below is a brief listing of some of the features available on the different Media Convergence products. This table is designed to give you an overview of each product and the general capabilities to help you make your decisions when trying to decide when type system is best for you. Other things to consider are things like how long has the company been in business, pricing, support and compatibility. Remember that one solution may be perfect for one user and may not be for another.

Item
ReQuest
IQ IMS
Escient
Fireball MX752
Kaleidescape
KSERVER-5000
Cannon
LX Series MediaCenter
TiVo
Cable DVR
Apple iTV

Pricing (approximate MSRP)
$7,000
$5,999
$17,000
$3,999
$300
Free with signup
$329

Category
Music Server
Music / Video Server
Music / Video Server
Media Center
Media Server
Set top Box / Media Server
Media Server

VIDEO FEATURES (TV,DVD, PHOTO)

Security Cameras
Yes

HR,SR

Internet TV

Yes

Record TV

Yes
Yes
Yes

Record HDTV

Yes
Yes
Yes

TV DVR (Play, Record, Rewind)

Yes
Yes
Yes

Max tuners

6
2
2-4

Record Digital Cable

Yes
Yes
Yes

Multi Zone Video Playback

Yes

Yes

Multi Zone DVD Playback

Yes HR
Yes

Play Photos

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Store Photos

Yes

Yes

Store Videos

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes

Store DVDs

Yes
Yes
SR

Burn Recorded TV to DVD or Blu-Ray

Yes
Yes

Movies On Demand (download)

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

DVD Changer Support

Yes
Yes
Yes

Play DVD Disks

Yes
Yes
Yes

Play Blu-Ray Disks

Yes HR
Yes

Home Automation Capable

HR, SR

Monthly Cost for EPG

FREE
$12.95
$7.00

AUDIO/MUSIC FEATURES

Digital Cable Radio

Yes
Yes
Yes

FM Radio
Yes

Yes

Internet Radio
Yes

SR
Yes

Store Music CDs

Yes

Yes

Yes

WMA Format (48-192kbps)
Yes
Yes

Yes

WMA Pro (32-192 Kbps)

Yes

Yes

WMA Var Bit Rate (40-355 kbps)

Yes

Yes

Windows Lossless (940 kbps)

Yes

Yes

MP3 (128-320 kbps)
Yes
Yes

Yes

WAV Lossless
Yes
Yes

Yes

FLAC
Yes
Yes

AAC

Yes

Yes*

Stream Music
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes

Multi Zone Audio Playback
HR
Yes

Yes

XM Radio
Yes

Yes

Sync with iTunes
Yes SR

Yes*

Yes

Whole House Audio
HR
HR

MISC FEATURES

Check Sports Scores

Yes
Yes
Yes

Manage Fantasy Football Players

Yes

Check Weather
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes

Browse the Internet

Yes

Check Email

Yes

Play Games

Yes

Yes

Instant Message

Yes

Parental Control

Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes

Calendar
Yes

Yes

Upgradeable (internal components)

Yes

Access PC Network Files
Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes

Storage Capacity (max)
1.5 TB
750 GB
100 TB
4 TB
250 GB
250 GB
160 GB

1 NetSync application required
* MCETunes Application required
HR – Additional hardware required to perform this function or capability
SR – Additional Software Required

NOTE: – All information contained in this document is for informational purposes only. Any person should consult a local authorized dealer or representative for each of the products recommended to obtain product information and pricing. Information is subject to change.

Whole House Distributed HDTV

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009

Author: Steven R.Gould

The solution I chose involved using a VideoStorm CRM88 8×8 Matrix Switch at the center of the system. This could take HD component video and digital optical or coax audio inputs from each device and output any of these inputs to any of up to eight TVs. To distribute the audio and video signals to each outlet I opted to use one of the unused Cat5 cables and a pair of Muxlab 500050 component video and digital audio baluns.

As more of a “casual observer”, both the picture and sound quality on each HDTV seemed great – every bit as good as viewing the content with the device directly connected to the TV. The only difference being that I was able to watch the same content on any TV and, if needed, on two or more of the TVs at the same time. This has already started to come in handy in unexpected ways. Clearly it is nice being able to start a show in say the living room then continue it in another. However, recently my daughter wanted to order a movie via AppleTV. Instead of me having to go into her room to authorize the purchase, I could do it from one of the other TVs in the house by viewing the same content.

Abstract

The various ways to distribute analog, standard definition television around the home are well established. However few, if any of these can be extended to distributing HDTV (High-Definition Television) around the home. In this article we present one way of doing just that. And all without having to run expensive, dedicated component video, digital audio and/or HDMI (High-Definition Multimedia Interface) cables to every room.

The article uses as a case study the application of these ideas in the authors house.

The home layout and challenges
Several years ago I ran structured wiring bundles to multiple outlets in most rooms. Each bundle consisted of a pair of coax cables and a pair of Cat5e cables. When I ran these cables I didn’t know specifically what each would be used for though I was expecting the coax to be most likely used for TV signals and the Cat5e for a gigabit data network and telephone. At the time consumer-level HDTV products and technologies were scarse and so I did not know what kind of options I would have for later distributing HDTV signals around the house. I was hoping that I’d be able to use the gigabit data network and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) to distribute the HD content.

We live in one of the few areas of the country where cable TV uses a “dual line” setup requiring a pair of coax cables. As a result anywhere we wanted to put a cable converter box we had to have two coax runs to that point. Not a big deal because of the wiring bundle. However for most locations we were content with – and even preferred – making do with Line A cable TV on the one coax, and broadcast TV on the other coax.

Fast forward a few years and I’d started to acquire several quality HD sources including a Motorola HD cable box, Sony HD DVR, PlayStation3 (with its Blu-ray DVD capabilities) and an AppleTV. Clearly I did not want to purchase multiple such devices for each of the rooms, though I wanted to be able to share the content between the four – and later possibly more – HDTVs. So I needed to come up with a distributed, whole house HDTV solution utilizing the existing wiring.

The proposed solution
My initial ideas of using IPTV via the gigabit data network or modulating an HD signal onto a channel and distributing via the coax wiring whilst technically possible would have been cost prohibitive. I also had to address the challenge of how to remotely control these devices.

The solution I chose involved using a VideoStorm CRM88 8×8 Matrix Switch at the center of the system. This could take HD component video and digital optical or coax audio inputs from each device and output any of these inputs to any of up to eight TVs. To distribute the audio and video signals to each outlet I opted to use one of the unused Cat5 cables and a pair of Muxlab 500050 component video and digital audio baluns. Of the four pairs of wires in a Cat5 cable, one pair was used for the digital audio and one pair for each of the red, green, blue component video connections. So this solution used all eight wires (four pairs) in a single Cat5 cable. This was all well-and-good though I was hoping to have one pair spare for carrying the remote control signals for each of the devices.

Controlling Devices Remotely
For remote control I looked at several options including using a pair of wires from a Cat5 cable, a radio frequency (RF) solution, and using available bandwidth on one of the coax cables. The problem with using a pair of wires from a Cat5 cable was that I was using one of the Cat5 cables for the HD A/V signal and wanted to keep the other Cat5 cable free for a gigabit network connection. I would have had two pairs free if I was content with a 100-BaseT (100Mbps) data network connection, though again I was trying to plan for the future.

I also looked at using available bandwidth on one of the coax cables. This would require adding an infrared (IR) eye to each destination and connecting that back to an IR injector to inject the signal into the coax cable. Then on the receiving end reversing that process to control each of the devices. This was certainly do-able in my situation, though I decided to take a look at RF remote control first.

RF remote control had the advantage over IR remote control in that it does not require line-of-sight access to the receiver. For this I looked at both the Xantech XTR39 Universal remote plus base station, and the Philips Pronto TSU9400 Universal remote plus RF extender. The Xantech remote control seemed like a nice and affordable solution especially considering that I would probably end up wanting to purchase 2-3 of these remotes. However having previously used the ProntoEdit software and being accustomed to its flexibility, I felt that the Xantech Dragon software for programming the XTR39 was far more limited. To be fair, I didn’t really get into whether these limitations were due to the editing software itself or limitations of the device.

So I then decided to try the Pronto TSU9400 remote and RF extender. Though two to three times more expensive than the Xantech, I felt that the TSU9400 was far superior. It looked and felt great in the hand. The screen was bright and clear, and it had a good number of “hard” buttons. After some initial programming and setup of the TSU9400 I was able to try out its RF remote capabilities. I was concerned about dead zones and poor communications between the remote and the extender, especially considering I’d had previously experienced numerous problems with computer WiFi connections within the same house. However, the response was quick, crisp and felt like I had the device I was trying to control right there in front of me.

I have since learned more about the way the Pronto packages and sends its commands. It actually groups together multiple commands into a single packet and delivers the entire packet. This ensures that all of the commands are sent and executed in the correct order in one go resulting in far more reliable and predicatable control.

Audio output
For the living room and master bedroom I had a receiver that could handle coax digital audio input. These were going to be easy to setup. For the rooms without a receiver I then started looking for smaller LCD HDTVs with coax digital audio inputs. Perhaps I should have known this but the smaller LCD HDTVs do not generally come with digital audio inputs – just outputs. So I was faced with another challenge: how to (affordably) convert the digital audio signals to an analog, stereo signal. Should I buy an inexpensive, low-end receiver for each of these rooms? When I looked into this I found that the low-end receivers do not handle digital audio input, just stereo input. Therefore I had to move more towards the mid-level receivers and a few hundred dollars more. This was something I wasn’t too excited about. Plus I really didn’t want another device sitting there in each room. I kept searching for options.

Eventually I found a small, digital-to-analog audio converter that was little bigger than a small matchbox from Gefen. Though it did need a power supply it was small enough that it could easily be mounted behind the LCD HDTV.

Installation and setup
Compared to the solution design and product selection, the actual installation and setup was much easier. Though I ran into some problems with not all of the colors coming through to the first HDTV I setup, this was easily traced back to a single wire back at the central distribution panel not being punched down fully. Fixing this gave me a good picture but I wasn’t getting any audio. This turned out to be due only to my inexperience with the CRM88 matrix switch. The device I was using was outputing the digital audio via fiber optic cable. The way I had configured the CRM88 switch it was trying to output to the TV the digital coax input (which was not plugged in!).

After selecting the correct audio input/output mapping, I now had both an HD video and digital audio being sent from the central distribution panel to the HDTV some 50′ or so away. This was looking good and proved that this solution could work.

I was able to set up the second HDTV in a fraction of the time, with the same great result. The third HDTV was a smaller LCD TV with no digital audio input. This is where the digital-to-analog stereo audio converter came in. I hooked this up and everything came up just fine on the third TV.

I still have some of the devices downstairs in the living room that I am planning on moving upstairs to the central distribution closet. Aside from physically moving the device and plugging it into the CRM88 matrix switch, all that is required are a few simple changes to the Pronto configuration. Firstly, I’ll need to change the Pronto configuration to send commands for that device via RF instead of IR – something the ProntoEdit Pro software makes very easy. Secondly, I’ll need to configure the Pronto to appropriately select the input device as output to the various TVs. VideoStorm makes this easy by supplying discrete remote control codes for use with the Pronto line of remotes.

A logic layout of the main components and connections in the final, planned set-up is shown in the diagram below:

What will it all cost?
The main costs with this kind of setup will probably be the professional services involved setting it all up. Running new cables, installing a distribution panel and new termination boxes all takes time and even more so if you are trying to do this in an existing home. When I started on this mini adventure I looked for a local contractor that would run the wiring for me. Most of those I spoke with would not even entertain the idea, preferring to stick to new construction projects only. As a result I ended up running the wires myself – something that took significantly longer than having a professional do it, but probably also saved me a considerable amount of money. Plus I got to install as many termination boxes as I wanted.

In addition to the wiring, you will obviously need to purchase appropriate HDTVs, receivers and speakers as needed, and the HD input devices you wish to use. These can vary considerably and by individual preferences so are not costed out here. Therefore I will focus on the additional cost of distributing the HD content to the different HDTVs since that is the primary focus of this article.

So, aside from the wiring, input and output devices, the other costs were as follows. You will need a matrix switch – something like the VideoStorm CRM84 for 1-4 outputs and CRM88 for 5-8 outputs. You will also need two component video/digital audio baluns for each output or television outlet. For the outlets that do not have a receiver capable of taking a coax digital audio input, you will also need a digital audio to analog stereo audio converter. Note that if you have a receiver that only takes optical digital audio input, you can purchase a Digital Audio (S/PDIF) Coaxial to Toslink Optical Digital Converter for around $20.

To give you an idea of cost, I will consider a smaller setup of three rooms: one home theatre room with projector and digital audio-capable receiver, one living room with digital audio-capable receiver and a study with an LCD HDTV with stereo audio inputs only. Secondly I will illustrate a medium sized setup of five rooms: the same three as before, plus two bedrooms with HDTVs capable of stereo audio input only and no receiver.

For the smaller setup of three rooms, the costs would be as follows:

Device
Unit Cost
Quantity
Total Cost

Matrix switch (VideoStorm CRM84)
$1,200
1
$1,200

3 x 2 x Component Video/Digital Audio baluns (Muxlab 500050)
$60
3 rooms x 2 per room
$360

1 x Digital Audio to Analog Stereo Audio converter
$80
1 room x 1 per room
$80

3 rooms (2 with receivers with digital coax inputs and one with stereo inputs)

Total cost:
$1,640

For the second example of 5 rooms, the cost breakdown is as follows:

Device
Unit Cost
Quantity
Total Cost

Matrix switch (VideoStorm CRM88)
$2,500
1
$2,500

5 x 2 x Component Video/Digital Audio baluns (Muxlab 500050)
$60
5 rooms x 2 per room
$600

3 x Digital Audio to Analog Stereo Audio converter
$80
3 room x 1 per room
$240

5 rooms (two with receivers with digital coax inputs and three with stereo inputs)

Total cost:
$3,340

Results
Please bear in mind that I am not an A/V purist and have not run any in-depth tests of either the sound or picture quality. I can definitely tell the difference between a Standard Definition picture and an HD picture, or the difference between stereo sound and surround sound. However I’m not the sort of person that notices any significant difference between 1080i and 720p (though I understand the technical differences).

Therefore as more of a “casual observer”, both the picture and sound quality on each HDTV seemed great – every bit as good as viewing the content with the device directly connected to the TV. The only difference being that I was able to watch the same content on any TV and, if needed, on two or more of the TVs at the same time. This has already started to come in handy in unexpected ways. Clearly it is nice being able to start a show in say the living room then continue it in another. However, recently my daughter wanted to order a movie via AppleTV. Instead of me having to go into her room to authorize the purchase, I could do it from one of the other TVs in the house by viewing the same content.

Initially my wife was not thrilled with the idea of sacrificing an entire upstairs closet for all of this equipment. I had to “sell her” on a promise. However now that things are coming together and she is able to enjoy the flexibility the set up offers, she has now forgiven me and realizes that it was all worth it!

Biography
Steven R. Gould (email: author@stevengould.org) is a senior technical advisor for an international entertainment company. He has 17+ years experience working with a variety of technologies in a variety of industries and also recently became certified as a Level 2 Philips Pronto installer. As an independent author he has authored articles for IBM develolpersWorks, JavaWorld, LinuxWorld, SunWorld and more, as well as contributed to several books.

Disclaimer: Unless otherwise stated, the author has no affiliation with any of the vendors mentioned in this article. While there no doubt are other solutions available, the intent of this article was to describe a practical application of a variety of the available products to provide the intended outcome of whole house, distributed HDTV.

Resources

VideoStorm web site: http://www.video-storm.com
VideoStorm CRM88 product information: http://www.video-storm.com/proddetail.asp?prod=CRM88
Philips Pronto web site: http://www.pronto.philips.com
Philips Pronto TSU9400 product information: http://www.pronto.philips.com/index.cfm?id=1457
Muxlab 500050 component video and digital audio baluns: http://www.muxlab.com/products/ve_vga_component_audio_balun.html
Gefen digital audio to analog audio convertor: http://www.gefen.com/kvm/product.jsp?prod_id=4907
Sony: http://www.sony.com
Xantech XTR39 Universal remote: http://www.xantech.com/products/keypads/XTR39.htm
Steven R. Gould web site: http://www.stevengould.org