Unconventional thinking could boost solar cells
There is an old saying about not rocking the boat; but when it comes to hiking the capabilities of solar energy, the opposite is true.
Unconventional solar cell materials, much less costly than silicon and other semiconductors in use today, could substantially reduce the cost of solar photovoltaics, according to a new study from the Energy and Resources Group and the Department of Chemistry at the University of California, Berkeley, and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL).
These materials, some of which are highly abundant, could expand the potential for solar cells to become a significant source of low-carbon energy across the world, according to the study authors.
The analysis examines the two most pressing challenges to large-scale deployment of solar photovoltaics as the world moves toward a carbon neutral future: cost per kilowatt hour and total resource abundance.
The UC Berkeley study evaluated 23 promising semiconducting materials and discovered 12 are abundant enough to meet or exceed annual worldwide energy demand. Of those 12, nine have a significant raw material cost reduction over traditional crystalline silicon, the most widely used photovoltaic material in mass production.
The work provides potential for research into novel solar cell types just at a time when the U.S. Department of Energy and other agencies plan to expand the use of clean energy, said Daniel Kammen, UC Berkeley professor of energy and resources and director of the Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory.
Kammen and colleagues Cyrus Wadia of LBNL and A. Paul Alivisatos of UC Berkeley’s Department of Chemistry embarked on an intensive research project to explore the question if high-impact materials have been overlooked or underdeveloped during the last several decades of solar cell research.
“The reason we started looking at new materials is because people often assume solar will be the dominant energy source of the future,” said Wadia, a post-doctoral researcher who spearheaded the research. “Because the sun is the Earth’s most reliable and plentiful resource, solar definitely has that potential, but current solar technology may not get us there in a timeframe that is meaningful, if at all. It’s important to be optimistic, but when considering the practicalities of a solar-dominated energy system, we must turn our attention back to basic science research if we are to solve the problem.”
The most popular solar materials in use today are silicon and thin films made of CdTe (cadmium telluride) and CIGS (copper indium gallium selenide). While these materials have helped elevate solar to a major player in renewable energy markets, they still suffer from manufacturing challenges. Silicon is expensive to process and mass produce. Furthermore, it has become increasingly difficult to mine enough silicon to meet ever-growing consumer demand.
Thin films, while significantly less costly than silicon and easier to mass produce, would rapidly deplete our natural resources if these technologies were to scale to terawatt hours of annual manufacturing production. A terawatt hour is a billion kilowatt hours.
“We believe in a portfolio of technologies and therefore continue to support the commercial development of all photovoltaic technologies,” Kammen said. “Yet, what we’ve found is that some leading thin films may be difficult to scale as high as global electricity consumption.”
“It’s not to say that these materials won’t play a significant role,” Wadia added, “but rather, if our objective is to supply the majority of electricity in this way, we must quickly consider alternative materials that are Earth-abundant, non-toxic and cheap. These are the materials that can get us to our goals more rapidly.”
The team identified a large material extraction cost (cents/watt) gap between leading thin film materials and a number of unconventional solar cell candidates, including iron pyrite, copper sulfide, and copper oxide. They showed iron pyrite is several orders of magnitude better than any alternative on important metrics of both cost and abundance. In the report, the team referenced advances in nanoscale science to argue they could offset the modest efficiency losses of unconventional solar cell materials by the potential for scaling up while saving significantly on materials costs.
Finding an affordable electricity supply is essential for meeting basic human needs, Kammen said, yet 30% of the world’s population remains without reliable or sufficient electrical energy. Scientific forecasts predict to meet the world’s energy demands by 2050, global carbon emissions would have to grow to levels of irreversible consequences.
“As the U.S. envisions a clean energy future consistent with the vision outlined by President Obama, it is exciting that the range of promising solar cell materials is expanding, ideally just as a national renewable energy strategy takes shape,” said Kammen, who is co-director of the Berkeley Institute of the Environment and UC Berkeley’s Class of 1935 Distinguished Chair of Energy.
For related information, go to www.isa.org/manufacturing_automation.
“The safety network market will benefit from the same quantifiable cost savings in areas such as wiring and installation that fueled adoption of standard device networks over hard wiring, plus they can deliver concrete business benefits in areas such as regulatory compliance and reduced shutdowns. The timing and impact of safety regulations remains a wild card in many parts of the world, but both existing suppliers and new entrants are lining up their safety network strategies as the technology increasingly emerges as a key differentiator,” according to Vice President 